Law

Rectifying the problem of duplicate reporting of multiple reports and reducing the burden on grassroots by allowing data to "run away"

2024-04-16   

Recently, when discussing the changes in inputting data related to population reduction, Li Wenbing, Secretary of the Party Committee of the Zhuangyuan Community in Guihu Street, Xindu District, Chengdu City, Sichuan Province, said, "Now, sharing can be achieved with just one input, which not only greatly improves work efficiency, but also promotes the transformation of functional departments from requesting data from grassroots to finding platforms to check data. This is truly reducing the burden on grassroots cadres." Under the supervision and promotion of the Xindu District Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision, and after coordination and optimization by relevant departments, now only scanning QR codes through WeChat can fill in population reduction information. The information filled out will also be automatically collected into the corresponding database, and the system will automatically configure 11 forms that meet the needs of each department, including the elderly subsidy reduction form and the retirement benefit cancellation form. The form data will be automatically supplemented in the database, freeing grassroots cadres from repeated filling and multiple filling, and freeing up more energy to implement. But in the past, it was a different scene. "For the same matter, this department provided a template for collecting data from 'since the beginning of this year', while that department required the entry of data from 'this quarter' into the system. It would take more than half a day to complete these statistical reports alone." Li Wenbing told reporters that he had previously reflected this issue during a grassroots efficiency special research symposium organized by the district discipline inspection and supervision commission. Li Zhiye, Deputy Director of the Party and Political Conduct Supervision Office of the Xindu District Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision, introduced that during the special investigation on grassroots efficiency, the district commission for discipline inspection and supervision, in conjunction with the district committee office, the district committee organization department, the district committee social governance committee, the district committee editorial office, and the district judicial bureau, formed four research groups and visited 9 towns (streets) and 36 villages (communities). In the process of on-site supervision, data review, investigation and unannounced visit, and telephone return visit, the research team collected many grassroots workers' reflections on "too many and too many forms", "multiple and repeated report forms", and "data fight and lack of integration". Generally speaking, the community (street) only needs to count the name, ID number, address and other information of relevant personnel to form an account. "But according to the requirements of functional departments, these information still need to be filled in 11 forms and 5 systems," said Li Zhiye. It is reported that the top scorer community serves more than 13000 residents. Community workers are required to complete a "fixed action" every month - inputting information on changes in personnel and housing data, and updating real-time information on layoffs within their jurisdiction. "In the past, these data had to be compared and verified one by one, and then manually entered into the system. Since the launch of the 'AI Social Work Assistant Application' on the 'Community Simplified Governance' management platform, it can be easily imported with just a finger." Li Wenbing said that there are many community work affairs, and the intelligent application has freed grassroots from the complex work of information collection and extraction, improving work efficiency. But the lack of smooth data sharing leads to information asymmetry, making relevant functional departments more accustomed to "asking for data from the grassroots". Previously, three cadres in a certain community within the jurisdiction of Xindu Street were given additional subsidies due to failure to timely grasp the situation of the death of community subsistence allowance personnel. When investigating the case, the Street Discipline Inspection Commission noticed that there were objective factors in the statistical work, such as too many information entry forms and unclear barriers to data sharing between departments, which could easily lead to information omissions and deviations. Based on the issues discovered through special research and case handling, the Discipline Inspection Commission and Supervision Commission of Xindu District have repeatedly communicated with departments such as civil affairs, human resources and social security, and health to supervise

Edit:GuoGuo Responsible editor:FangZhiYou

Source:People.cn

Special statement: if the pictures and texts reproduced or quoted on this site infringe your legitimate rights and interests, please contact this site, and this site will correct and delete them in time. For copyright issues and website cooperation, please contact through outlook new era email:lwxsd@liaowanghn.com

Recommended Reading Change it

Links