The explosive popularity of the domestic AI model DeepSeek has once again given rise to a group of "shovel sellers", specifically those who "cut leeks" through paid courses - on social media platforms, some traffic speculators use "sudden wealth" and "wealth freedom" as gimmicks to attract and sell courses. Consumers who believe it to be true only realize that paid materials are just free content "carried" by sellers and emphasize that virtual goods cannot be returned or exchanged. For example, the recently widely circulated "DeepSeek: From Beginner to Mastery" tutorial by a team under Professor Shenyang from Tsinghua University, where free materials are sold by different sellers at prices ranging from 0.01 yuan to 15 yuan; Some 104 pages of paid materials only have 4 pages discussing DeepSeek; Some of ChatGPT's old tutorials are renamed and resold... Rather than calling these infringing and low-quality content "courses," it's more like sickles disguised as knowledge. As Professor Shenyang has stated, 'First, do not engage in fraud; second, do not infringe upon intellectual property rights; third, do not harm consumer rights.' When it comes to issues related to consumer rights, relevant departments and platforms should promptly handle illegal and irregular behavior. On the other hand, from ChatGPT to Sora and then to DeepSeek, whenever a new technology becomes popular, there is a similar "knowledge sickle" harvesting "leeks". The way to avoid it is to learn to coexist harmoniously with "AI anxiety". In fact, people who don't need to sell courses say, 'Those who don't know how to use XX will inevitably lose their jobs within XX years.' Faced with the powerful and unknown AI, many people love and fear it both. They love it for theoretically improving efficiency, but fear that if they can't keep up with the forefront, their competitiveness will decline. Therefore, they constantly learn through various channels and even fall into the anxiety marketing trap of unscrupulous sellers. Throughout the history of human technological development, whenever new technologies emerge, they trigger people's anxiety, and AI is no exception. Although there are negative aspects to 'AI anxiety', it is needless to say that it has been eradicated. Having a clear understanding of the routine of "cognitive harvesting" and maintaining a moderate level of "AI anxiety" can also be a good motivation to urge people to continue learning. Looking back, those who did not purchase ChatGPT or Sora courses in the past did not become unemployed or eliminated by the times as portrayed by the sellers; It seems that few of those who bought classes have achieved financial freedom due to inspiration. Whether it's paid knowledge or free sharing, it's not ruled out that professionals and others can share high-quality content, but no one can guarantee that new technologies will provide the "ultimate tutorial" as soon as they come out, making people "get rich" and reach the peak of their careers as soon as they learn. The reality is more likely that a group of people who make quick money and don't know much about technology often teach others to seize opportunities, constantly changing bottles to contain the same wine, causing panicked people to lose time and money and continue to stay in place confused. Learning remains an effective way to alleviate anxiety, but in the era of information overload, good learning resources also require deep exploration. (New Society)