In today's era, intelligent warfare is taking unstoppable steps forward, especially with the widespread application of artificial intelligence in the military field, making the concept of "unmanned" warfare increasingly respected by the world. The competition for "intellectual power" and "brain power" is becoming increasingly fierce, and many people describe intelligent warfare as a war directed in a "laboratory". Some people believe that future intelligent warfare is a competition of intelligence, and as long as one relies on superior intelligence, they can stand invincible. But in fact, can it really be like this? Undoubtedly, intelligence, intelligence, and strategic thinking are essential qualities for commanders and are highly valued by people. The reason why we admire Zhuge Liang when reading the characters of the Three Kingdoms is that he is resourceful and resourceful. For Zhang Fei, we all think he is brave and resourceless. However, modern psychology believes that only 20% of a person's success in their career depends on their intelligence. A research institution has studied the 20% most accomplished and least accomplished people in the world, and found that the biggest and most significant differences between these two groups are not only in intelligence, but also in non intellectual factors such as willpower, courage, beliefs, and personality. It can be seen that there is a significant contrast between the actual utility of intelligence and the ideal value in people's minds. War, as a special social phenomenon, naturally means that the higher the intelligence of the participants, the better, but it should also be viewed dialectically. In the history of human society, the outcome of war is often the result of the comprehensive use of various factors such as strength, strategy, willpower, and perseverance. Although intelligence plays an important role in war planning, tactical formulation, and other aspects, emotional factors such as hatred and self-confidence, as well as willpower factors such as courage and execution, also have a significant impact on the outcome of war. During World War II, German general Rommel once said, "Countless facts tell us that in the past, generals with extremely high intelligence were often defeated by enemies with average intelligence but firm will." At the same time, revolutionary mentor Lenin, who proposed "there is no war without strategy," also made a frank evaluation of the importance of intelligence: "In the moment of a decisive battle, the other spiritual characteristics of a general cannot be denied to have overwhelming power over all other situations... Military science is not solely based on intelligence, and the activity of intelligence is not the most important thing in military science." It cannot be denied that compared with the past, modern warfare is more prominent in terms of intelligence and intelligence, and the intelligence, intelligence, and intelligence of soldiers are increasingly playing an irreplaceable role. The immeasurable impact. But the fact also tells us that human intelligence is by no means infinite, nor is it omnipotent. Those who believe that modern warfare is an intellectual game, where one can easily defeat opponents by playing on a computer or typing on a keyboard, may be unrealistic. In reality, some of us always aspire to be like Zhuge Liang, hoping to "come up with a plan that can overthrow a million armies; with a plan, even a lone army can win". Little did they know that no matter how cunning Zhuge Liang was, without the support and cooperation of his subordinates, the "Five Tiger Generals," he would probably only be "staring blankly. So Engels repeatedly warned us that in analyzing and synthesizing problems, we cannot sacrifice one and elevate another to the sky. We must pay attention to their interconnection and complementarity. From the recent military conflicts, it can be seen that the brutality and brutality of war pose a comprehensive test to people, both materially and spiritually; Both intellectual and non intellectual factors are included, and any weakness in either aspect can trigger a domino effect of battlefield collapse. From historical experience, those with exceptional intelligence but weak willpower are likely to think not about how to turn danger into safety or survive, but about how to avoid risks when faced with danger; When faced with difficulties and setbacks, the first thing that comes to mind is not how to face them and achieve established resolutions, but how to modify them. Furthermore, exceptional intelligence cannot compensate for the lack of willpower, while tenacious willpower is more conducive to the extraordinary performance of intellectual level. As the saying goes, there has never been a war without strategy throughout history, nor has there been a war that relies solely on strategy. Future intelligent warfare is a competition of comprehensive strength and composite capabilities. The more we value intelligence in our military training and preparation, the more we must prevent singularity. At present, as we are promoting the transformation of military training that includes both intelligence and innovation, it is very necessary to highlight the cultivation of non intellectual literacy among officers and soldiers as an important content. By continuously increasing the difficulty, intensity, and risk of training, we can hone the fighting spirit and tenacious character of officers and soldiers who are not afraid of hardship and death, temper their determination and will to overcome countless difficulties and resolutely complete tasks, promote the organic integration of skill training, intelligence training, ideological training, and work style training, and strive to make non intellectual factors an important weight for future battlefield victories. (New Society)