On the 27th, the United States Supreme Court decided not to terminate the rapid deportation order of illegal immigrants, which had been implemented for two years on the grounds of epidemic prevention, with 5 in favor and 4 against. The Supreme Court's decision was welcomed by Republicans who took a hard line on immigration, while the Democratic government has been seeking to end the fast eviction order. The "only way" to alleviate the crisis? In November, Judge Emmet Sullivan of the Federal District Court in Washington ruled that the "42" rapid deportation order for illegal immigrants was illegal and should be suspended. The 19 Republican dominated state governments maintain that once the implementation of the fast expulsion order is terminated, the number of illegal border crossings that have reached a record will rise significantly, resulting in the shortage of resources for illegal immigrants in the states where they settle in the United States. The dispute went to the Supreme Court. On the 27th, the Supreme Court, which was dominated by conservatives, overturned Sullivan's ruling by 5 votes in favor and 4 against, and announced that it would hear an oral debate on the case in February next year. The Supreme Court upheld the 19 states' opinion. "These states claim that they are facing the border immigration crisis and the policy makers have failed to reach an agreement on how to fully respond to it," the ruling wrote, "These states suggest that the only way to alleviate the crisis is that the Court orders and instructs the federal government to continue to implement the '42 Article' policy during the COVID-19 epidemic as soon as possible." When the "42 Article" was implemented in March 2020, it was at the beginning of the COVID-19 epidemic in the United States. The government led by Donald Trump, then President of the Republican Party, cited the relevant provisions of the United States Code concerning public health and civil rights, and on the grounds of epidemic prevention and control, carried out collective expulsion of immigrants who tried to enter the United States illegally across the land border, without separately assessing the specific situation and protection requirements of these immigrants. The United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention announced in early April that the United States did not need to continue to implement the rapid expulsion order on the grounds of "protecting public health", which was originally scheduled to expire on May 23 this year. However, a judge of the Louisiana Federal District Court ruled on May 20 that the express expulsion order continued to take effect. White House: Democratic President Joseph Biden, "not an immigration enforcement measure," sought to end the fast eviction order after taking office. White House press secretary Karina Jean Pierre said on the 27th that the Biden government will abide by the Supreme Court's order and make preparations for the Supreme Court to try the "42" related cases, while continuing to make preparations for "managing the border in a safe, orderly and humane way when the" 42 "is finally terminated". Jean Pierre said that "Article 42" is a public health measure rather than an immigration law enforcement measure, and "should not be extended indefinitely". American Civil Rights Union lawyer Lee Grunt expressed disappointment at the Supreme Court's decision not to terminate the rapid expulsion order. He said that immigrants will continue to suffer from this, "we will continue to fight until this policy is finally abolished". The rapid expulsion order has led to a substantial increase in the number of illegal immigrants being expelled and arrested. According to the Associated Press, according to this policy, the United States has expelled 2.5 million illegal immigrants. Andrea Rudnick, the co-founder of an immigration assistance organization, said that the situation outside the southern border of the United States was simply a humanitarian crisis. Thousands of migrants sought to enter the United States across the cross-border bridge